Mar 19 2010
Post Production Remorse and a Couple Other Thoughts . . .
So, I’ve heard in said that one can be in post-production indefinately. Indeed, many films are. I have several on my imdb that have been in “post production” for YEARS! My own experience as of late has me wondering about this: Is a prolonged post period due to a project floundering? Or due to the incessant nagging of one’s own perfectionism – daring just one last tweak, one final amendment to the finished product to make it even better? We all want to make our creative endeavors a success. We all want high regard and respect for our tireless efforts. So, it’s no wonder that when we say “It’s done” there is an itch to go back for one more look. I have the itch, and I hate myself for it. I swore at the start of this venture that I wasn’t going to be one of “those” people – the actors who plead for one more take because they didn’t “feel it” that time; the film-makers who will tweak a scene to death, adding a filter to change the look of a five second scene and then changing their minds and taking it off, only to find that now they miss the filter. It’s chaos of the creative intellect and a sure-fire sign to “let it go!” And yet, we find ourselves going back for one, last look.
I am not suggesting that, if an issue truly needs fixing, one ignores their instincts to make a change (even if the word “COMPLETE” has been uttered out loud) but slipping into a type of POST PRODUCTION REMORSE is dangerous territory. So, how do you evaluate whether making post post changes is valid or simply, indulgent?
Anyone . . . ?
I am asking because I don’t know!
But maybe THAT is the answer. If you can’t articulate specifically why something needs to be changed, chances are, it doesn’t. And the urge to fix something, is merely a defence mechanism in an effort to cope with a fear of failure. Because once something is done and put out there for all to see as a finished work of art, the door is held wide open for others to judge it accordingly. No more excuses, or time . . . And that’s scary!
Be brave! (I tell myself) “It’s done, except . . .” is invalid. I think I just needed to write it down for you all to read in order to come to this conclusion. The nagging might continue, but I will need to take up yoga or meditation to channel it.
Moving on to other thoughts racing through my noisy brain . . .
Who knew Post-Post Production could be SO EXPENSIVE! Ha! I thought that when we began submitting to festivals, the costly part was over. Of course, I planned for the submission fees and such, but had not really considered the expenses of conversions. “How naive! “many of you are, I’m sure, crying out! “Of course!” I reply. It’s my first time doing this. Here is what I am learning – anyone who does know this already, please skip ahead!
We shot in HD, and then made a DVD master. Looks great! Only, MANY of the festivals we are submitting to do not accept DVD for their exhibition format. Which means that, if accepted, we need to convert to a different format. And there are more than several out there to choose from. What I have found in my research is that most of the festivals accept Digibeta across the board. In fact I don’t think I have come across one that doesn’t. Digibeta is not the highest quality format (although it is certainly higher than DVD) but will not break the bank and is again, widely accepted. You will need to take your Uncompressed, Stand alone Quicktime file (preferably from your hard drive as the file is usually too large for a disc and would have to be separated then re-assembled) and get a digibeta master done. You will pay for the tape stock and the conversion fee. There is a HUGE range of prices from Post House to Post House, so get figures from at least 5 facilities. Now, other acceptable formats of higher quality include HDCAM, miniDV, SRCAM, and of course, 16 or 35mm Film (there are more, but these are the top choices) Film will always be accepted (but the cost is exorbitant) The others are widely accepted, but less so as compared with Digibeta. Just something for you all to think about as you are planning budgets and scheduling timelines.
Once you’ve paid for a master Digibeta (for example) I recommend you keep the master (rather than sending it off to the festival) and making a clone of it. You will send the clone to the festival, and everytime you need a conversion (which will be a lot) you can have another clone made from your master. This saves you money so you will not be paying for the initial conversion and set-up each time.
I wish you speed in your journey and hope I imparted a little wisdom in this lengthy entry. It helps me to put it all down, so thank you! I wish you a blissful night’s sleep . . .
